Archive

Archive for the ‘Social Media’ Category

Architectural changes in marketing

July 8th, 2009 No comments

This is a guest post by Glenn Schmelzle, who is contributing his analysis on the new opportunities in marketing that follow from the paradigm shifts sweeping the information technology landscape.

OK, so marketing isn’t known for its use of cutting-edge tools. But as someone who’s been handling the tools for 15 years, I have noticed big changes in the technology that supports the buying and selling of products. These technologies have made life easier for both sellers and buyers, but I’ve deliberately skewed them because the more they’re used, the more they end up benefitting one side more than the other.

Innovations benefiting the buyer’s side:
Probably the biggest boon for those who need to do their research before buying is the corporate website. Unlike the days of calling an 800 number and getting a brochure or catalogue in the mail (and several follow-up calls!), people can obtain rich detail on a product before identifying themselves. Thanks to XML, price-shopping sites allow them to compare competing products. Sellers aren’t fond of these developments, because they have to divulge a lot of information, but market forces give them no choice.

As email became the dominant communications mode for B2B interaction, it began to be accompanied by a terrific tool: the spam filter. This innovation, more than legislative restrictions, has put people in control of their inboxes. They are preferred by any principled marketer and very feared by any spam artist. Sure, there’s room for sellers to send a one-time-only inquiry as well as opt-in based emails, but in the end, you can choose who to maintain relations with on email.

Social media is on the rise as a buyers’ tool. Its chief use here is to connect with others to share information on products without even consulting the product’s makers. There were earlier iterations of this like TripAdvisor and Epinions, but the newer crop: Twitter, Facebook, Techcrunch and the blogosphere have put the web’s usefulness as a third-party opinion tool into overdrive.

Innovations benefiting the seller’s side:

I think CRMs have had the largest impact in recent years. Whether local or in the cloud, private or open-sourced like SugarCRM, they are great for letting everybody in a company toss what they know about the customer into one bucket. The resulting profile gives a picture of prospects that is much more accurate than ever before. Here’s one example of how CRMs and direct marketing techniques have helped: You used to receive new product promotions in proportion to the product’s revenue forecast. If you weren’t part of the audience it was meant for, tough! Now, you are (usually) receiving promos for items geared for you. The fact that you receive more of these messages is a direct result of the mushrooming number of products on the market; it’s not marketing’s fault.

The beta deserves mention. No, not the VCR format that duked it out with VHS in the ’80s. Few technologies today are launched ‘cold,’ most are pre-released to power-users. Everything about a product can be crowd-sourced today…and it’s a good thing. The vehicles for leaking info (and code) on new products have also exploded in use. WebEx, AppExchange, sourceforge and Amazon’s EC2  have all dramatically reduced the cost of sharing work-in-progress with potential buyers. This ultimately lowers risk for the seller; no one wants to have another ‘New Coke’ fiasco on their hands.

Creating documents in Adobe format has been a significant development in marketing. As the P in PDF indicates, it’s made print-quality collaterals extremely ‘Portable.’ This has not only eliminated printing and mailing costs, it has produced instant gratification and reaction from buyers on the content of those documents. If buyers don’t react well to the collaterals, marketers can re-write and re-publish them in no time.2016 balklänningar Line. Denna samling erbjuder ett brett utbud av vackra stilar, så du kommer att vara säker på att hitta din perfekta klänningen. Dessa hänförande balklänningar varierar i stil. Så du kan vara sexig, klassiker, sassy, våga, och så mycket i en av dessa fantastiska klänningar! Det är en klänning för alla, ser till att ge en smickrande stil för alla

Finally, I’ll mention the umbrella category of Business Intelligence tools, that includes web analytics, email measurements and social media monitoring. These are all means for marketers to understand what works – this data was nigh unto impossible to have in pre-Internet days. Marketing Automation tools like Silverpop, Marketo and Eloqua are now giving unprecedented visibility into the sales funnel. This holds the promise of tightening sales forecasts and informing executives specifically how well their tactics are working.

To conclude, these tools have been fantastic as they’ve forced buyers and sellers to rethink how they do business. Together, these have all helped buyers and sellers reach out to each other. I think they’ve supplanted old, crude, disruptive marketing methods. They provide a great indication of how far we can go in the future, although knowing exactly where innovation will happen next is anyone’s guess.

Glenn Schmelzle is a technology marketer and worked with Shahzad at an Ottawa-based startup. He can be reached at glenn.schmelzle@utoronto.ca

Conquering Twitter Information Overload: Synching Tweetdeck Settings

April 16th, 2009 No comments

If you’re anything like me, you get around a thousand tweets a day, and have a small set of messages you definitely want to read, and have a huge river of messages that you can live without (but which you’d like to dip into occasionally). In short, you need to construct a filter to retain tweets that are interesting to you, and relegate to the junk mail status those that are not. It’s like a spam filters for your friends chatter!

I’m working on a smart way of doing this, based on profiling myself(or other interested users) and the individuals in their networks (learned from their Mozilla Firefox bookmarks). Meanwhile, I need a quick and dirty solution that can filter by source (i.e. person) based on my impression of the relevance and quality of their tweets (learned via meatspace processing, i.e. manually!).

Well, my tool of choice for this operation is Tweetdeck. This serves my needs well; I simply created a group, and add people to this group when their postings are useful, and occasionally drop individuals when the number of participants in the group crosses a tolerable threshold.

However, once again, if you’re anything like me, you work on at least four different computers, because of your need to work at different locations and operating system (I find laptops are not powerful enough for my needs). So, in the absence of the ability to sync Tweetdeck settings across machines, what’s an overwhelmed Twitteraholic to do?

Well, if you’re tech-savvy, you have to assume that your preferences are stored somewhere, in a file, in a database, in the registry or perhaps the web! .. knowing that this is a light and relatively recent application, you can assume that it’ll be somewhere quite obvious.

Lo and behold, the seeker shall always find! A bit of poking around shows me that on Windows, it’s stored in a file:

td_26_[username].db

Copy the td_26_[username].db from the following directory on the source PC to the same directory on the destination PC.

C:\Documents and Settings\[Windows User]\Application Data\TweetDeckFast.F9107117265DB7542C1A806C8DB837742CE14C21.1\Local Store

.. and voila, you have just transitioned your valuable, I-invested-time-in-this, settings over to the new location.

Let me know if this helps you (via your comments) and also please let me know if anything blows up !

Tags: